Germany in the 1930s was recovering from several crushing blows-- the loss in World War I, the heavy burden of reparations, massive inflation, bizarre political events, the rise of Nazism, and so on.
Hitler rose to power, giving us World War II and the Holocaust, because the German people were simply driven insane by all these pressures. There was a power vacuum at the top and the people demanded a strong leader to take over.
None of those conditions exists in the US today. Our economy is strong; our political processes are moving along normally-- in the SNAFU sense, anyway; and the occupation of Iraq is a negligible expense in dollars and lives (2% of the GDP, 0.08% of the mortality rate).
So Naomi Wolf's position is grossly overstated for political reasons of her own.
Any democratic people should remain mindful of the potential for this kind of breakdown in social order, but it simply isn't going to happen here unless things get a LOT worse.
When you cry wolf (or Wolf) and nothing bad happens, you make it that much more difficult for people to respond appropriately to the real threats. In this case, the real threats are the tiny incremental compromises in individual liberty, the slow growth of socialism undermining our free markets, and the marginal increases in governmental power.
These are the things we need to act against rather than wondering if Dubya is actually Hitler II.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
The Ominous Parallels
Date: 2007-11-06 12:33 am (UTC)http://www.peikoff.com/op/home.htm
What Peikoff doesn't say on his website, but which is part of Amazon's description of the book...
http://www.amazon.com/Ominous-Parallels-Leonard-Peikoff/dp/0452011175
...is that he wrote this in 1983.
But it wasn't true then, and it isn't true now.
Germany in the 1930s was recovering from several crushing blows-- the loss in World War I, the heavy burden of reparations, massive inflation, bizarre political events, the rise of Nazism, and so on.
Hitler rose to power, giving us World War II and the Holocaust, because the German people were simply driven insane by all these pressures. There was a power vacuum at the top and the people demanded a strong leader to take over.
None of those conditions exists in the US today. Our economy is strong; our political processes are moving along normally-- in the SNAFU sense, anyway; and the occupation of Iraq is a negligible expense in dollars and lives (2% of the GDP, 0.08% of the mortality rate).
So Naomi Wolf's position is grossly overstated for political reasons of her own.
Any democratic people should remain mindful of the potential for this kind of breakdown in social order, but it simply isn't going to happen here unless things get a LOT worse.
When you cry wolf (or Wolf) and nothing bad happens, you make it that much more difficult for people to respond appropriately to the real threats. In this case, the real threats are the tiny incremental compromises in individual liberty, the slow growth of socialism undermining our free markets, and the marginal increases in governmental power.
These are the things we need to act against rather than wondering if Dubya is actually Hitler II.
. png